Bitrise / Codemagic
- The app is everything you ship.
Bitrise and Codemagic can do iOS. That is their job. If the same change also has to touch Laravel and the website, you do not need a second mobile CI — you need a project.
Mobile CI/CD is a solved problem while the app is the product. The moment the same version also needs a backend and a site, you pay for the seams between tools — not for the builds.
This reflects the typical scope of each option. Details change over time, so check the current information from each provider when it matters.
| Criterion |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Flutter and Expo builds | Fully covered: Prepared pipelines for Flutter and Expo projects | Fully covered: Core product, mature and widely proven |
| Native iOS and Android builds | Fully covered: Native project types are part of the templates | Fully covered: Core product, with many ready-made building blocks |
| macOS machines for iOS | Fully covered: Pipeline macOS machines for iOS builds. Interactive macOS workspaces come next | Fully covered: macOS runners are part of the offering |
| Managing signing material | Fully covered: Android keystore, Apple credentials and Azure Artifact Signing held in the platform | Fully covered: Signing management is a focus of these services |
| Store metadata and screenshots | Fully covered: An editor for texts, screenshots and changelogs per language inside the project | Partly covered: Upload through Fastlane, metadata usually maintained in the store portal |
| Deploying a web frontend | Fully covered: Next.js, Astro and Hugo run from the same project base | Not offered: Not what the service is for |
| Running backend services | Fully covered: NestJS, Laravel and FastAPI as long-lived services with a database | Not offered: Not part of the product |
| Setting up and running servers | Fully covered: Your own server over SSH or a managed one, with Docker, proxy, SSL, firewall and backups | Not offered: Not part of the product |
| Development environments | Fully covered: Ubuntu workspaces with VS Code, JetBrains, RDP and VNC. iOS builds on the pipeline’s macOS machines | Not offered: Not part of the product |
| Mobile-specific extras | Partly covered: Fundamentals covered, but no mobile-only feature depth | Fully covered: Extensive building blocks, device test runs and mobile integrations |
Green means fully covered, amber partly, grey not offered. Specialised mobile CI services are mature in their field – the difference lies in how much of the chain each option covers.
As of 9 September 2026. This comparison describes typical workflows and can differ from project to project. Logos are trademarks of their owners and are used only to identify the product.
Specialised mobile CI often bills build minutes. Numbers live with those vendors. Here mobile is part of the same project.
Pipeline for Customer App
Four steps from project to store release.
Pick Flutter, Expo or a native iOS or Android project. Repository, structure and pipeline are created with it.
Apple credentials, Play access, the Android keystore and, if needed, Azure Artifact Signing are kept in the platform.
Titles, descriptions, screenshots and per-language changelogs live in the metadata editor rather than the portals.
Create backend and web interface in the same project. They share the server connection, environments and credentials.
No. Both specialise in mobile builds and ship a large catalogue of ready-made steps. If your app is the entire product, there is little reason to switch. The comparison gets interesting once other parts sit alongside the app and also need shipping.
Flutter, Expo and native iOS and Android projects are prepared templates, each also as a whitelabel variant. For iOS builds, macOS machines in the cloud are provided. Publishing runs through Fastlane to the App Store, Play Store and Microsoft Store.
Signing material is managed inside the platform: Android keystore, Apple credentials and Azure Artifact Signing. Roles and project membership govern who may use it. The benefit is resilience: a keystore living on one laptop is a well-known risk.
Partly. The platform runs on GitLab CI and the configuration is readable in the repository, so you can add stages and change conditions. Steps written in another service's configuration language have to be ported. Fastlane steps usually carry over.
No, review times at Apple, Google and Microsoft stay exactly as they are. What gets automated is everything before that: build, signing, versioning, metadata, screenshots and the upload. That shortens the path from finished feature to submission.
Register for free, create a mobile project and see how far the pipeline gets without any groundwork.